数学中国

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
楼主: moranhuishou

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

[复制链接]
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-19 10:49 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

谢芝灵:
没有必要讲这些小儿科!
发表于 2007-8-19 12:36 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

你认为你是上帝吗?
不理解复数,不懂方程,还扯什么定理,上帝知道的只会比我们多,你连基本的数学常识都没有,不停的给自己的说法补漏,这是上帝的本事吗?
发表于 2007-8-19 12:38 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

The quiz is as follows:
    * There are 5 houses, each is a different colour
    * In each house lives a person of a different nationality.
    * These 5 owners all drink a certain beverage, smoke a certain brand of cigar and keep a certain pet.
    * No owner has the same pet, smokes the same brand of cigar or drinks the same drink as another owner.

1: The Briton lives in a red house.
2: The Swede keeps dogs as pets
3: The Dane drinks tea
4: The green house is on the left of the white house (they are also next door to each other)
5: The green house owner drinks coffee
6: The person who smokes Pall Mall rears birds
7: The owner of the yellow house smokes Dunhill
8: The man living in the house right in the center drinks milk
9: The Norwegian lives in the first house
10: The man who smokes Blend lives next to the one who keeps cats
11: The man who keeps horses lives next to the man who smokes Dunhill
12: The owner who smokes Blue Master drinks beer
13: The German smokes Prince
14: The Norwegian lives next to the blue house
15: The man who smokes Blend has a neighbor who drinks water.

The question is: WHO KEEPS FISH?
上帝,有种回复一下,顺便代详细解释,OK?
发表于 2007-8-19 12:43 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

A cat is placed in a sealed box. Attached to the box is an apparatus containing a radioactive atomic nucleus and a canister of poison gas. This apparatus is separated from the cat in such a way that the cat can in no way interfere with it. The experiment is set up so that there is exactly a 50% chance of the nucleus decaying in one hour. If the nucleus decays, it will emit a particle that triggers the apparatus, which opens the canister and kills the cat. If the nucleus does not decay, then the cat remains alive. According to quantum mechanics, the unobserved nucleus is described as a superposition (meaning it exists partly as each simultaneously) of "decayed nucleus" and "undecayed nucleus". However, when the box is opened the experimenter sees only a "decayed nucleus/dead cat" or an "undecayed nucleus/living cat."
The question is: when does the system stop existing as a mixture of states and become one or the other (see basis function)?
my God,if you really in the world,please show me the answer,okey?
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-19 18:00 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

下面引用由fuel20002007/08/19 00:36pm 发表的内容:
你认为你是上帝吗?
不理解复数,不懂方程,还扯什么定理,上帝知道的只会比我们多,你连基本的数学常识都没有,不停的给自己的说法补漏,这是上帝的本事吗?
你真可怜:什么上帝?世界上有上帝吗?这不过是一种文体,借“上帝”之口表述解释一下证明而已!
还有“补漏”之说就更可笑:我自己的证明,有了漏洞完善一下,这不很正常吗?陈景润的证明、怀尔斯的证明开始不都有漏洞吗,并且还都是在论文正式发表之后发现的。
怎么?允许他们补漏,我为什么就不行?只要我能补上!
你这样吹毛求疵有什么意思?
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-19 18:32 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

12000:
你的英文题目就更可笑(我见过中文的),不知道你这样做能说明什么?
你和刘翔比,肯定也有比他强的,但人家的强项就是110米栏,别的你就是超过他能说明什么问题?
发表于 2007-8-19 23:48 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明


执迷不悟,精神病一个.
  数学逻辑错了.漏洞能修吗?
  你在一页一楼有1)式有正整数解,(3)式不能化为(1)式.所以(3)式没有正整数解.
  上述逻辑假设正确.那么此逻辑必经得起验证.
   把(1)式换成----狗.把有正整数解换成----四条腿..把(3)式换成猫.
  按你的逻辑得:狗有四条腿,猫不能化成狗.所以猫没四条腿.
   显然错误.故你的逻辑错误.
  记住:逻辑要经得起任何验证的.
发表于 2007-8-20 07:53 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

天大的笑话:
在:x^2+y^2=z^2中除"0"以外最小的一组整数解是:3^2+4^2=5^2.
可以规定3,4,5.不是平凡解.
在:X^n+Y^n+Z^n=K^n中,除"0"外,最小的一组整数解是 3^3+4^3+5^3=6^3..
当对自己不能自说其圆时,则规定,3,4,5,6,是一组平凡解.
所谓平凡解就是没意义.
在:x^n+y^n=z^n.中,0^n+0^n=0^n.1有意义吗?.x^n+0^n=z^n.有意义吗?显然没有.故规定,某个数或全部数为零时,就是平凡解.
在:x^3+y^3+z^3=k^3中.同理:
0^3+0^3+0^3=0^3,和:x^3+0^3+0^3=k^3
是无意义的平凡解.
请问你凭什么说:3^3+4^3+5^3=6^3是平凡解
发表于 2007-8-20 11:33 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明

我问上帝,又没有问你,你不是有和上帝的问话吗,西方大神看不懂西文?你见过中文的,翻译试试(第二题)?不过,看你也蛮可怜加可悲,于是在自卑的心理中逆反地爆发出自傲,自己的思想何必狐假虎威?
那么,LHZ也不过是借用一种文体,干吗批评他宣传迷信?
陈景润他们不过是把自己的证明精简,不是补漏,且绝不是在基本问题上拧不清,就你这些“复数丑陋论”+不停在基本观点上补漏,真是可爱。
不知道你知道毕达哥拉斯定理否?该学派发明该定理绝对正确,可惜该定理引出无理数,于是,发现无理数的被杀了,如果你有权,恐怕复数理论一律得删除,谈论复数的一律KILL,是吗?
发表于 2007-8-20 14:40 | 显示全部楼层

三贴:斯露化雨 费马大定理的三句话证明


虽然楼主还在请出  “上帝”:
[ 楼主:网址:
http://www.mathchina.com/cgi-bin/topic.cgi?forum=5&topic=2898&show=0
就费马大定理的证明对话“上帝”(续):
“上:这本来就是一个胡搅蛮缠的问题,不值一提。
“节目”预告:
近日将推出新作:《费马大定理的又一铁证》。”]
不论楼主怎么歪理狡辩  把铁证用“上帝”的话说是“胡搅蛮缠 ”都无济于事!
三句话问题已成定论:错!!!
不需要毫无意义的再争论下去了!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|数学中国 ( 京ICP备05040119号 )

GMT+8, 2025-11-30 05:28 , Processed in 0.081725 second(s), 15 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表