数学中国

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 3396|回复: 6

张天树老师请进,关于我在美国数学会的投稿。

[复制链接]
发表于 2016-7-13 13:50 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Dear Prof. Jiang,

This message concerns the manuscript

   The proof of Fermat's last theorem
   by Shan Jiang

submitted to Proceedings of the AMS.

Unfortunately, we cannot accept it for publication.  If there are
referee reports attached to this letter, you may find
them of some use in revising the article for resubmission elsewhere.

I believe your argument is incorrect. Specifically, you write

"Because then Z is any integer, that is to say for the indefinite equation X^n+Y^n = Z^n, has X, Y, Z integers solution, the same for the indefinite equation X1^n + Y1^n = B^n, has X1, Y1, B integers solution(X1, Y1 are two integers I set)."

I see no reason whatsoever why X1^n+Y1^n = B^n should have integer solutions for the value of B that came from
your previous argument.

Sincerely,

Lev A. Borisov
Editor of Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Dear Prof. Jiang,

This message concerns the manuscript

   The proof of the Bill conjecture
   by Shan Jiang

submitted to Proceedings of the AMS.

Unfortunately, we cannot accept it for publication.  If there are
referee reports attached to this letter, you may find
them of some use in revising the article for resubmission elsewhere.

I don't understand the key point of your argument and I believe that your argument
is incorrect. Specifically, you write:

"Because E,D may be any value, n also may be any value, for the equation (2)
...
the equation (3) is the universal answer to indefinite equation of A^x +B^y = C^z. "

I believe that you are switching from integer solutions to rational solutions, or something
like that, for I see no reason why (3) would be the "universal answer" (whatever that means).

Sincerely,

Lev A. Borisov
Editor of Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
这是我第一次投稿,这位专家没有接受,我认为是他没有理解到我的证明,也可能是我的英文水平不好。后来我又投了一次稿件,我换了另外一位专家。可是。。
 楼主| 发表于 2016-7-13 13:51 | 显示全部楼层
Dear Prof. Jiang,

This message concerns the manuscript

   The proof of Fermat's last theorem
   by Shan Jiang

submitted to Proceedings of the AMS.

Thank you for your interest in submitting your paper to PAMS.
Unfortunately the editorial board of PAMS cannot accept your paper for publication. During the past year our journal has received more manuscripts than can possibly be accepted, which temporarily caused a considerable backlog. So, I regret to say, your paper has to be rejected without refereeing.

I hope you will be more successful in submitting your paper to another journal.

Sincerely,

Kathrin Bringmann
Editor of Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

ear Prof. Jiang,

This message concerns the manuscript

   The proof of the Bill conjecture
   by Shan Jiang

submitted to Proceedings of the AMS.

Thank you for your interest in submitting your paper to PAMS.
Unfortunately the editorial board of PAMS cannot accept your paper for publication. During the past year our journal has received more manuscripts than can possibly be accepted, which temporarily caused a considerable backlog. So, I regret to say, your paper has to be rejected without refereeing.

Sincerely,

Kathrin Bringmann
Editor of Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
 楼主| 发表于 2016-7-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
上面的那位专家没有能发现错误,但是说了,同类型的稿件已经被接受了,而且还有很多积压,叫我另投他处。
但是两个稿件的回复都是一模一样的,所以我怀疑他的诚意。
 楼主| 发表于 2016-7-13 13:57 | 显示全部楼层
所以我觉得再向国外投稿的意思不大了。别人可以用任何理由拒绝你,就算你的稿件没有错误,又能怎么样?
发表于 2016-7-15 10:44 | 显示全部楼层
如果你认为你的证明是正确的,不妨继续投稿世界上其它数学杂志。对于著名数学难题证明的确认,哪有一两次投稿就成功的?更何况你的证明或许还存在不足,需要修改。
 楼主| 发表于 2016-7-15 11:07 | 显示全部楼层
被遗弃的草根 发表于 2016-7-15 10:44
如果你认为你的证明是正确的,不妨继续投稿世界上其它数学杂志。对于著名数学难题证明的确认,哪有一两次投 ...

好的,张老师。其实加上原来的投稿我真的不止投稿一两次了,但是你对我的鼓励下,我决定再投几次。谢谢。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|数学中国 ( 京ICP备05040119号 )

GMT+8, 2025-7-28 19:04 , Processed in 0.105797 second(s), 15 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表